A24 is very much a "no middle sliders" studio. They're either going to show you the best thing you've seen in ages or a hot mess that at least still looks cool. Their decision to give "Backrooms" YouTube series creator Kane Parsons his own film was a bold one. And even as someone who's followed his channel and loves a bit of Internet-grown horror, I was iffy. The Backrooms are a setting, and one that's become somewhat open-source (even if Parsons's backstory involving ASYNC has become one of the best known versions). I feared that, in an attempt to do justice to something that's very big and sprawling, we wouldn't get a movie with depth and focus.
So okay, fortunately I was wrong. And while I don't think it was absolutely perfect, I do think it was really strong and very promising. And the approach taken was one that makes this analog horror juggernaut accessible without a deep dive.
I'm going to steer clear of spoilers because this is something that deserves to be experienced firsthand, so read on with confidence.
Clark is a very angry man currently attending therapy with Mary. He's been kicked out of his house by his wife and is now living in his failing furniture store. One night, woken by a power surge, he goes into the basement and discovers he can pass through a section of wall into a vast labyrinth of yellow rooms. He initially believes this place to be an as-yet-unknown extension of the store itself, but his mania to figure it out soon takes him over. Eventually, Mary receives a phone call luring her to the store, and she discovers the strange space Clark discovered, as well as its inhabitants.
Immediately, what works about this movie is that it is a character piece within the sandbox of the setting. We do indeed get some background about what the Backrooms could be, but it's all through the lens of Mary and her traumatic childhood. (Clark is not our central character, mind; he's our inciting incident.) ASYNC, the company exploring the Backrooms in Parsons's YouTube series, do indeed have a presence. But they hover indistinct throughout for the majority of the film, present either through devices threaded through the rooms or as silent watchers of Clark and Mary's exploration.
The two things that keep this movie strong are the script and the visuals. (Multiple facets of the movie were excellent, but these were the two pillars that would cause the whole movie to crumble if they collapsed.) The movie isn't done entirely in Parsons's blurry analog style, but there are multiple sequences shot essentially identically to the YouTube series: blurry visuals that make you question what you're seeing, shadows that disappear off the edge of frame before you can fully register them. Embracing or removing them entirely would both have been disastrous; this middle ground works, and it lets us see what Parsons can do in a more traditional style.
At the same time, Will Soodik's script treats the setting of the Backrooms not as a puzzle to be solved within the film's runtime, but as a metaphor for the psychological "path of least resistance" that keeps us comfortable in stagnation. It's not a stretch to interpret the film this way, either; it's right there on the surface, it exists in discussions between Clark and Mary. But the choice to make that the plot of the movie is absolutely brilliant, simply because of what analog horror and liminal spaces are in the first place.
Both of these trends have had a major uptick recent years, with Parsons racing to the head of an extremely packed field. It's an aesthetic and style of horror that I think first hit home with very specific demographics, of which I am a part. I remember those classrooms and play places and restaurants that, in hindsight, feel somewhat off. The degradation of old photographs and old memories wear away the edges of those places, making them feel both welcoming and haunting at the same time. A place you're certain you know every inch of, but that feels on some level like you shouldn't be there.
And perhaps that's why the concept of the Backrooms has resonated so much: because on some level, it's like our memories. We could nest ourselves in our pasts, in our old patterns, and be safe but still know it's not really where we're meant to be. We can deceive ourselves that it's close enough, and the longer we stay, the more strangely comfortable we feel. But these pasts that we cling to are distorted by nature, and they in turn distort us and the people in our lives.
I'm not sure how I feel about the film's ending. Not the final shot: that was great. But the final scene proper. It felt nearly properly paced, but not quite. But that could also just be the fact that it's the director's first movie. Having a secondary plot thread that feels slightly off is a very, very small issue in a first film that's otherwise legitimately impressive.
You don't have to have seen Parsons's original Backrooms YouTube series to enjoy the movie, but it still is a very enjoyable watch. I can't wait to see what he does next. I will be along for the ride every step of the way.